Is community based case detection of glaucoma relevant? Intraocular Pressure level and vertical Cup Disc ratio of participants at a screening programme in a rural setting in Nigeria

Main Article Content

Elizabeth A Awoyesuku
Ireju O Chukwuka

Abstract

To determine the proportion of participants with elevated intraocular pressure and abnormal vertical cup disc ratio in a glaucoma screening event in a rural community in Nigeria.


Methods: 242 eyes of 121 participants at a one-day screening programme were examined. Visual acuity was accessed using Snellen literate and illiterate charts, followed by a pen torch examination of the anterior segment. The posterior segment was accessed using a direct ophthalmoscope (Welch Allyn, USA). All participants had intraocular accessed using Keeler non contact tonometer and those with significant media opacity preventing view of the posterior pole had cycloplegic examination after dilatation with 1%Tropicamide drops. Data generated was expressed as percentages and means.


Results: 121 participants (242 eyes) were examined. There were 42 males and 79 females giving a M:F ratio of 1:1.86. Age range of participants was 0-90years with a peak in the 5th decade. Mean age was 32 years. 79.3% of participants had normal visual acuity of 6/4 -6/18, while 9.5% had visual acuity worse than 6/60.


83% of eyes had intraocular pressure within normal level, <21mmHg, 12.4% within 21-30mmHg and 4.6% >30mmHg.


73.1% of eyes had Vertical Cup disc ratio (VCDR) <0.5, 10.7% had 0.5-0.7 and 6.6%>0.7. 9.6% of eyes could not be accessed due to media opacities.


Conclusion: 6.6% of participants had suspicious discs and 4.6% participants had intraocular pressures above 30mmHg. Opportunistic screening for glaucoma remains one of the important modes of case detection for glaucoma in the developing climes and should be encouraged as a way to address the scourge of this blinding disease.

Article Details

Awoyesuku, E. A., & Chukwuka, I. O. (2018). Is community based case detection of glaucoma relevant? Intraocular Pressure level and vertical Cup Disc ratio of participants at a screening programme in a rural setting in Nigeria. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2(2), 022–026. https://doi.org/10.29328/journal.ijceo.1001017
Research Articles

Copyright (c) 2018 Awoyesuku EA, et al.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Weinreb RN, Aung T, Medeiros FA. The Pathophysiology and Treatment of Glaucoma: a review. JAMA. 2014; 311: 1901-1911. Ref.: https://goo.gl/ZNtGwi

Leite MT, Sakata LM, Medeiros FA. Managing glaucoma in developing countries. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2011; 74: 83-84. Ref.: https://goo.gl/TjmZoi

Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006; 90: 262-267. Ref.: https://goo.gl/aUW22V

Francis BA, Varma R, Vigen C, Lai MY, Winarko J, et al. Population and High Risk Group Screening for Glaucoma: The Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011; 52: 6257-6264. Ref.: https://goo.gl/Zrhzuy

Hollows FC, Graham PA. Intra-Ocular pressure, glaucoma and glaucoma suspects in a defined population. Br J Ophthalmol. 1966; 50: 570-586. Ref.: https://goo.gl/Nmzpim

Cedrone C, Culasso F, Cesareo M, Zapelloni A, Cedrone P, et al. Prevalence of glaucoma in Ponza, Italy: a comparison with other studies. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 1997; 4: 59-72. Ref.: https://goo.gl/kEMdmp

Ramakrishnan R, Nirmalan PK, Krishnadas R, Thulasiraj RD, Tielsch JM, et al. Glaucoma in a rural population of Southern India: the Aravind comprehensive eye survey. Ophthalmology. 2003; 110: 1484-1490. Ref.: https://goo.gl/bFqBKn

Abdull MM, Sivasubramaniam S, Murthy GVS, Gilbert C, Abubakar T, et al. Causes of blindness and visual impairment in Nigeria: the Nigerian national blindness and visual impairment survey. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009; 50: 4114-4120. Ref.: https://goo.gl/P5J7dv

Damji KF, Nazarali S, Giorgis A, Kiage D, Marcos S, et al. STOP Glaucoma in Sub Saharan Africa: enhancing awareness, detection, management, and capacity for glaucoma care. Expert Review of Ophthalmology. 2017; 12: 197-206. Ref.: https://goo.gl/zg8ZrX

Maul EA, Jampel HD. Glaucoma Screening in the real World. Ref.: https://goo.gl/1FW4uL

Abdu L. Epidemiological Properties of Primary Open Angle Glaucoma in Nigeria. Journal of Ophthalmology. 2013: Article ID 402739, 6. Ref.: https://goo.gl/i75ait

Kyari F, Gilbert C, Blanchet K, Wormald R. Improving services for glaucoma care in Nigeria: implications for policy and programmes to achieve universal health coverage. BrJ Ophthalmol. 2017; 101: 543-547. Ref.: https://goo.gl/vmVh5Y

Olawoye O, Fawole OI, Teng CC, Ritch R. Evaluation of community eye outreach programs for early glaucoma detection in Nigeria. Clin Ophthalmol 2013; 7: 1753-1759. Ref.: https://goo.gl/n9WMPu

Liang Y, Jiang J, Ou W, Peng X, Sun R, et al. Effect of community screening on the demographic makeup and clinical severity of glaucoma patients receiving care in urban china. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018; 195: 1-7. Ref.: https://goo.gl/3ubGPf

Jampell HD. Screening for glaucoma using intraocular pressure alone. BMJ. 2017; 358. Ref.: https://goo.gl/wf78F7

Kyari F, Entekume G, Rabiu M, Spry P, Wormald R, et al. A population-based survey of the prevalence and types of glaucoma in Nigeria: results from the Nigeria national Blindness and visual impairment survey. BMC Ophthalmology. 2015; 15: 176. Ref.: https://goo.gl/1gwqie

Wolfs RC, Borger PH, Ramrattan RS, Klaver CC, Hulsman CA, et al. Changing views on Open Angle Glaucoma: Definitions and Prevalences- The Rotterdam Study. Invest Ophthalmol & Vis Sci. 2000; 41:3309-3321. Ref.: https://goo.gl/tR4tuE